this a fair question. "Talent" is a term you hear bandied about in a
variety of contexts. It's used constantly in reference to celebrities:
in show business, performers are often referred to as "the talent";
sports analysts will talk about an outstanding athlete's "raw talent."
Grade-school kids impress audiences full of parents at talent shows,
while the existence of talent agencies and talent brokers implies that
talent is a rarefied commodity, something to be bought and sold.
But though the word is common, the concept remains elusive -- it
lacks substance, specificity. Perhaps that's part of the reason so many
people have trouble applying it to themselves personally.
Carefully
examining and refining the concept of talent may make it easier for you
to recognize it in yourself and others, in order to make the most of it
in your daily life. What is it, for example, that distinguishes talent
from related -- but very different -- concepts, such as competency or
style?
Let's start with Webster's definition of talent as "any natural
ability or power." Such a broad description may not seem like much to go
on, but it includes a word that is central to Gallup's perspective on
talent: natural.
Talent reflects how you're hard-wired. That's what sets the concept
apart from that of knowledge or skills. Talent dictates your
moment-by-moment reactions to your environment -- there's an
instinctiveness, an immediacy implied. Talent results in consistently
recurring patterns of thought or behavior. To deviate from those
patterns requires conscious effort, and such deviations are difficult to
sustain.
Knowledge and skills, on the other hand, imply learned behavior,
actions that require more active cognitive processing. What you know
reveals more about your experiences and education than about who you are
at the core. Behavior derived from knowledge and skills can be changed
far more easily than talent-based behavior, as new information
subordinates old in an individual's consciousness.
Talent can't be subordinated. It's constant and enduring. That's what
makes it talent. Understanding the difference between the two sources
of behavior changes everything.
All this may seem like common sense, but you'd be amazed at how often
the promise of talent is cast aside in the name of "well roundedness."
Many people think that the more they can diversify their base of
knowledge and skills, the more secure their future will become. Gallup's
research has confirmed that the opposite is more likely to be the case:
The more time and effort spent in areas of non-talent, the less
opportunity one has to utilize and refine one's talents -- and therefore
the more likely one is to become mired in mediocrity.
It's human nature to covet what we don't have. In the case of
material things, that yearning can be entirely healthy, because it's
often possible to go out and get those things. But when it comes to
talent, trying to attain what isn't there to begin with is a lost cause.
No comments:
Post a Comment